Which course of action can an injured party choose if they decide to continue the contract?

Choosing to request specific performance is a valid course of action for an injured party who decides to continue with a contract despite an injury or breach. Specific performance is a legal remedy that compels a party to fulfill the terms of the contract as originally agreed. This is particularly applicable in situations where monetary damages would not be adequate to resolve the issue, such as when the subject matter of the contract is unique or has exceptional value.

This course of action allows the injured party to enforce their rights under the contract and ensures that they receive the benefit of the bargain they originally agreed to, rather than simply seeking monetary compensation. It's a way to assert their interest in the performance of the contract while still adhering to its terms.

The other options do not adequately represent the potential remedies available to an injured party. Seeking a verbal agreement may not enforce the original terms of the contract and could lead to further disputes. Terminating the contract immediately would negate the party's ability to seek fulfillment of the agreement's terms. Bringing a dispute to court without notice may bypass crucial steps in legal processes and might not afford the injured party the specific outcomes they are looking for under the contract.